The market speaks of Hillary's value

Obama ~ Sunni-Moslem-In-Chief 

For these reasons

We never owe the Japanese 

An Apology for

Hiroshima 

Magasaki

They got what they deserved

The learned they needed to quit

Or get more of the same

Getting Rid Of Randy Forbes

Of Virginia

Before Congress Begins its 2017 Session

Lets Use Our Power to Fix The Problem With Congress !

Arguing About Nothing, and Doing Nothing About Every Thing !!!

Lets Vote Out Democrats

Then Purge RINOs

We Have a Solution

Purge RINO  Randy Forbes

Scott Taylor For Congress!!

Halloween Specials

Then	Now

Why libertarianism is closer to Stalinism than you think

Tidewater Libertarian Party Neo-Marxist?
Read and determine for yourself .
If Looks like a duck, Quacks like a duck, 
walks like a duck, flies like a duck, swims
like a duck its a Duck.

Neo-Marxist?

Whatever else happens, 2016 offers one of the most interesting presidential elections in decades. It already includes a libertarian from Kentucky, Senator Rand Paul, and a socialist from Vermont, Senator Bernie Sanders. Americans, polling has shown, dislike socialism. Let Paul have any success, and they may like libertarianism even less.

For many American voters, libertarianism now has a certain freshness because it seems to cross the otherwise impregnable line between right and left. Sharply reducing the role of government in American life, libertarianism’s primary objective, appeals to conservatives because it offers an end to Obamacare, Social Security and other programs that transfer public money to the less well-off. Yet it also attracts liberal voters who ardently oppose invasions of privacy and bloated defense spending.

Paul’s appeal doesn’t stop there, however. He understands that the GOP base is getting older and whiter — which bodes badly for the party’s future. He is reaching out to minorities. By attacking his party’s attempts to restrict the vote, Paul could attract many African-American and Latino voters. He has also appealed to younger voters by calling for less restrictive drug laws, for example, and speaking at college campuses, where older Republicans have been loathe to appear. Paul is, in many ways, the Republican Barack Obama.

Ayn Rand in 1957. WIKIPEDIA/Commons

But do not be fooled. Libertarianism has a complicated history, and it is by and large a sordid one. Its leading 20^th-century theorist was the novelist Ayn Rand, who, for all her talk of freedom, was an authoritarian at heart. She was intolerant of dissent and conspiratorial to  a fault. Libertarians elected to public office on the basis of her ideas, including former Republican Representative Ron Paul, Rand Paul’s father, have adhered to such radical positions as abolishing the Federal Reserve.

Rand Paul has somehow moderated the crankier side of the movement that has shaped his career. Though isolationism is built into libertarianism, Paul has strongly defended Israel’s actions in the Middle East, which appeals to Republican neo-conservatives. At the other end of the political spectrum, he drew in both libertarians and the left with his 10-hour filibuster protesting the National Security Agency’s domestic surveillance of Americans.

Politicians often change positions based on what voters and donors demand. But Paul’s efforts to appeal to different audiences represent something more than political pandering. Libertarianism is not like other sets of ideas, and Paul’s maneuvering is not quite business as usual.

For libertarianism is among the most rigid of modern ideologies. The theorists who formulated its core principles were seekers after political purity. They created an ideal world designed to work perfectly — but only if human beings acted consistently. Society, to them, was like a Swiss watch: Let every part play its designed role, and the whole thing would run on its own accord.

Libertarianism in that sense is not merely an economic doctrine or a political worldview. It proposed, as Ayn Rand realized, a secular substitute for religion, complete with its own conception of the city of God, a utopia of pure laissez-faire and the city of man, a place where envy and short-sightedness hinder creative geniuses from carrying out their visions. If there was anything its founders hated more than governmental authority, it was religious authority.

Such a religious-like ideal requires careful scrutiny to ensure that no one breaks the rules or, in religious terms, commits a sin. Individuals are free to act in their self-interest — indeed, are required to — but if they grow lazy or are swayed by emotions or altruism, society’s best achievements will come crashing down around them.

GOP presidential candidate Representative Ron Paul speaks to supporters as his son Senator Rand Paul (L) applauds at his Iowa Caucus night rally in Ankeny, Iowa, January 3, 2012. REUTERS/Jim Young

Libertarianism, in short, resonates with an avid quest for political purity. The ideas of both conservatives and liberals are flexible enough to give way, at least on occasion. Obama, for example, regularly advocates compromise in principle, and conservatives, who do not, nonetheless fight frequently with each other. Those associated with libertarianism have no such room to maneuver; those who disagree are treated like apostates.

Yet if libertarianism is principled, it is also an impracticable set of ideas. Republicans who want to increase the defense budget can, and do, get results. Democrats who sought national health insurance finally realized their objective after decades of trying. But how, exactly, does one get government “interference” out of business when business wants it there most of the time? Is a libertarian foreign policy even imaginable, let alone workable? Truly principled libertarians believe that government should refrain from telling women what to do with their bodies, but should there be no regulation of medical procedures?

Libertarianism seems to be a philosophy designed not for governance but for opposition. It is loud and powerful when saying “no,” but often impotent and speechless when required to say “yes.”

Match the idealism of libertarianism with its impracticality, and it is no wonder that Paul’s campaign may wander from one extreme to another.

Paul, for one thing, has a major problem with his friends. Pure libertarians, like those devoted to his father, watch his every move, suspicious that he will sacrifice their zeal in favor of wider appeal. To keep them pleased, Paul must from time to time speak directly to their fears. His effort to hold up a Senate vote on extending the NSA’s authority to collect Americans’ telephone records served that need well. Taking a page from Jimmy Stewart in Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, Paul knows the symbolic value of seeming to stand alone to stand for his people.

The effect, by early accounts, was electric; Paul was fulfilling his destiny as the successor to his dad. The trouble is that not all votes are symbolic and, for that reason, relatively easy to cast. Let there be a vote on something substantive, especially where budget deficits are involved, and Paul is likely to disappoint true believers.

Senator Rand Paul (C) is flanked by reporters as he arrives for a Republican Senate caucus meeting at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, October 16, 2013. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

Paul has an even greater problem with his enemies. It is not that difficult to be a Republican member of Congress from a conservative district in Texas and be a faithful libertarian. Ron Paul proved that. It is harder to be a libertarian as a senator representing an entire state — even a conservative one like Kentucky. Yet Rand Paul has managed to pull that off.

But to have a chance for the presidency and remain faithful to libertarian principles is a far more difficult — if not impossible — task.

It is here where the impracticality of libertarian ideas will torment the Paul campaign. For Paul to stand with Israel is to issue a direct slap to the isolationism of his father’s passionate supporters. Nor is pandering to the neo-con hawks likely to satisfy. Strong support for Israel exists in both parties, and no matter how hard Paul expresses his solidarity with that country, he can never hope to compete with a national-security consensus that he has so often challenged.

Paul’s problems at the national level are exacerbated because however inspiring libertarian principles may be to the truly committed, they are elitist at their core. The more 2012 GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney and his vice presidential choice, Representative Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), sounded like Ayn Rand’s hero John Galt in Atlas Shrugged, the more unpopular they became. Contempt can get you attention, but it is unlikely to attract votes. Presented with a libertarian nominated by a major party, voters are likely to find him scary if true to his convictions and weak if he is not.

So crowded is the race for the Republican nomination that Paul might possibly get it. The fact that all the other primary candidates will most likely attack him throughout the debates, could possibly attract sympathy voters. But even if he were to somehow pull that off, he would, as a presidential nominee, have to be a traitor either to his father or to his party, the one caring only to make a point, the other desiring nothing less than winning.

Other ideologies bend but rarely break. A libertarian nominated by a major party is more likely to break than bend. The good news is that if Paul were to win the Republican nomination, libertarianism’s unfitness for the modern world would be revealed for all to see. The bad news is that the poison of its extremism would enter into the body politic, perhaps never to be fully ejected.

They would not allow this

Petey Browder Food Cart

At Ocean Front in Virginia Beach

They won't give her a peddler's license

I, too, was having a hard time believing some of Brian Wiliams tales of courage under fire. But that was before I saw this unretouched photo of Brian's recon aircraft after scouting a story over the Commanche Nation in Lawton, Oklahoma in 2009.

Jihad Kayla

Spreading her legs for her moslem lovers

Her German anti-Jew pro moslem stand, just like the Hitler youth groups of years past live in her soul.

Who Was Kayla Mueller?

Sadly, [not so much ~ she has now become a good jihadist] she was allegedly killed by the Jordanian air raid attacks according to ISIS who held her hostage, although the United States says there is no evidence to that effect. The truth of how Kayla Mueller, 26, died may never be discerned. However, despite the sadness at her needless death, the myth that she was wonderful altruistic young woman should be exposed. This is another Rachel Corrie propaganda story in the making, and the western media is falling for it again, or embracing it on purpose.

Kayla Mueller was a member of the International Solidarity Movement (ISM) who spent at least two years working with that terrorist support group. She was involved in demonstrations against the Jews in Sheikh Jarrah (part of East Jerusalem) after a 20 year long court decision recognized the Jews' legal rights to homes they were chased from in earlier wars launched by the Arabs. She also participated in demonstrations to interfere with the IDF demolishing the homes of terrorists and suicide bombers after the courts okayed the demolitions.

Just as with Rachel Corrie, the press tries to paint Kayla as a selfless volunteer helping poor Arab refugees. She may have helped injured Arabs in "refugee" camps, but she was working to support the goals of Palestinian irredentists and to interfere with the IDF on behalf of terrorist groups.

As an ISM activist she was a tool for the worldwide jihad.

A letter she wrote which appears on the ISM’s website describes the usual ISM claims of atrocities that never occurred, but were fabrications worthy of Pallywood.

First, she lived and rioted with other ISM activists with an Arab family that refused to vacate a home they were squatting in after a legal case that took 20 years established it was stolen from the Jewish owners.

She wrote propaganda letters for the ISM website:

“Just the next year in 2009 Ashraf’s brother, Bassem Abu Rahma, was participating in the demonstration and was attempting to communicate with the IDF soldiers telling them to stop shooting the steel-coated rubber bullets as an Israeli activist had been shot in the leg and needed medical attention. Not soon after an Israeli soldier illegally used a tear gas canister as a bullet hitting Bassem in the chest, stopping his heart and killing him instantly,” she wrote.

Of course, the Arab propaganda rag Al Jazeera told the story that way. This really occurred during one of the weekly riots in Bi’ilin in the WestBank where the Arabs demonstrate “nonviolently” by throwing rocks at the IDF soldiers as well as incendiaries. Kayla was there with the ISM to participate. Kayla admitted to being present at the weekly riots.

She was also a human shield in support of terrorists. She wrote:

 “I could tell a few stories about sleeping in front of half demolished buildings waiting for the one night when the bulldozers come to finish them off; fearing sleep because you don’t know what could wake you. . . . I could tell a few stories about walking children home from school because settlers next door are keen to throw stones, threaten and curse at them. Seeing the honest fear in young boys eyes when heavily armed settlers arise from the outpost; pure fear, frozen from further steps, lip trembling.”

Most Jewish residents of Judea and Samaria are religious Jews. Many are professionals who wish to lead quiet family lives. They do not generally engage in violence, except for an aberrant few who sometimes engage in non-life threatening vandalism and are severely castigated by the rest. The ISM hit on a strategy of accusing the Jews in the 'West Bank' of what the Arabs do continually to Jews: throw stones, attack school children, destroy produce etc.

Another ISM strategy is to try and disable Israeli security tactics. One of the newer ones is to try and suggest that when the IDF uses tear gas toavoid lethality in controlling weekly Arab rioters, the gas is really deadly and must be stopped altogether. The real reason for this inversion about tear gas is the Palestinians and their ISM lackeys hope they can make it impossible for the IDF to control the weekly riots such as in Bi’ilin, riots Kayla was a part 
Freedom? For whom? Another Arab dictatorship. Arabs who are Israeli citizens are free, but Kayla wanted the "free" Palestinian-state-to-be from the “river to the sea” as a good ISM activist.
of.

“The smell and taste of tear gas has lodged itself in the pores of my throat and the skin around my nose, mouth and eyes,” she wrote. “It still burns when I close them. It still hangs in the air like invisible fire burning the oxygen I breathe. When I cry tears for this land, my eyes still sting. This land that is beautiful as the poetry of the mystics. This land with the people who’s (sic) hearts are more expansive than any wall that any man could ever build. Yes, the wall will fall. The nature of impermanence is our greatest ally and soon the rules will change, the tide will turn and just as the moon waxes and wanes over this land so too the cycles of life here will continue. One day the cycle will once again return to freedom.”

Freedom? For whom? Another Arab dictatorship. Arabs who are Israeli citizens are free, but Kayla wanted the "free" Palestinian-state-to-be from the “river to the sea” as a good ISM activist. Her writings suggest the classical thought processes of pampered American student “radicals” and “revolutionaries” who can’t get enough of supporting dictatorships and terrorists overseas as liberation movements, the complete opposite of what they are.

“Oppression greets us from all angles”, she wrote. “Oppression wails from the soldiers radio and floats through tear gas clouds in the air. Oppression explodes with every sound bomb and sinks deeper into the heart of the mother who has lost her son. But resistance is nestled in the cracks in the wall, resistance flows from the minaret 5 times a day and resistance sits quietly in jail knowing its time will come again. Resistance lives in the grieving mother’s wails and resistance lives in the anger at the lies broadcasted across the globe. Though it is sometimes hard to see and even harder sometimes to harbor, resistance lives. Do not be fooled, resistance lives,”  Kayla concluded in her letter.

This certainly doesn’t sound like a tireless “aid worker”. Instead, it connotes a supporter of Palestinian Arab terrorist groups. Her praise of the muezzin calls and “resistance” suggests she’s on the side of the worldwide jihad, not viewing all human beings, even Jews, as having the same rights.

Kayla Meuller made it clear she was involved in the weekly riots in Bi’ilin. She wrote of Arabs who died at the hands of the IDF, due to non lethal tear gas usage as if that resulted in several members of the same family who she roomed with dying. Rachel Corrie did the same thing, creating a story for the ISM of protecting an Arab family from IDF bulldozers. One family daughter Kayla guested with died in her own home, not at a demonstration. The fact was the woman was very ill, with leukemia and other internal infections. As in good ISM tactics, her corpse then became another propaganda tool. But like any good ISM activist, Kayla Mueller didn’t let this stand in the way of her propaganda letter home:

“And now just today, the daughter of the Rahmah family, Jawaher, has been asphyxiated from tear gas inhalation. Jawaher was not even participating in the weekly demonstration but was in her home approximately 500 meters away from where the tear gas canisters were being fired (by wind the tear gas reaches the village and even the nearby illegal settlement often). There is currently little information as to how she suffocated but the doctor that attended her said a mixture of the tear gas from the IDF soldiers and phosphorus poisoned her lungs causing asphyxiation, the stopping of the heart and death this afternoon after fighting for her life last night in the hospital. The following is a clip from today showing hundreds of Palestinians, Israelis and international activist carrying her body to her families (sic) home where they said their final goodbyes.”

The IDF doesn’t use phosphorous in the West Bank. The ISM always claims it does. It’s good for propaganda.

“This family has a tragic story, but it is the story of life in Palestine. Thank you for reading. Ask me questions and ask yourself questions but most importantly, question the answers. Forever in solidarity, Kayla”, she concluded.

Kayla Mueller came from Prescott, Arizona where she once volunteered at a women’s shelter. Instead of continuing to help those who needed it in America, she chose to take the ISM’s revolutionary path and to embrace part of the worldwide jihad and she died for it, tragically. But she was no true altruist. She sought “freedom” working to support fascist groups that provide just the opposite for their people and she paid the ultimate price for that choice.

Kayla Mueller exposed: 'Martyr' was propagandist for Gaza Islamists

February 13, 201512:24 PM MST

Play

BuzzFeed News spoke with the President on the death of Kayla Mueller.

on.aol.com

Students at Northern Arizona University are planning to hold an on-campus memorial on Saturday for the American woman who was allegedly held hostage by the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) and was killed either by bombs dropped on ISIS by Jordan's air force of by her captors. While the American news media have portrayed the activist as a sainted humanitarian, reports indicate that Kayla was not only a supporter of the jihadists but she also worked as a propaganda-peddler for the International Solidarity Movement, an anti-Israeli and anti-American organization that supports Islamists in Gaza, according to a reliable source, Lyle J. Rapacki, Ph.D., CEO of Sentinel Intelligence Service, LLC.

Although the U.S. news media have chosen to treat the story of Kayla's death as a solemn episode, intelligence sources and Middle Eastern news media paint a picture diametrically opposed to the fawning coverage afforded Mueller. For starters Kayla was a "useful idiot" for the jihadist organizations whose members know how to craft an effective propaganda program that would have been praised by the likes of Stalin, Mao and Hitler.

Rapacki informed the Examiner that not only was Kayla Mueller a member of the International Solidarity Movement (ISM) and spent at least two years working with that recognized terrorist support group, she allegedly was involved in demonstrations against the Jews in East Jerusalem. After graduating from college in 2009, she first went to northern India and then she traveled to the Palestinian territories and Israel to assist humanitarian groups, her family told reporters and Obama administration officials. Following her activism and propaganda campaign against Israel -- which included accusing Israeli police and soldiers of using substances they didn't even possess -- she decided to go Syria to help people, especially children.

"Syrians are dying by the thousands and they're fighting just to talk about the rights we have," the humanitarian worker told The Daily Courier, her hometown newspaper in Prescott, Arizona. "For as long as I live, I will not let this suffering be normal."

Sadly, she was allegedly killed by the Jordanian air raid attacks according to ISIS who held her hostage, although the United States says there is no evidence substantiate that claim. "One cannot help but feel sadness over her death, but Americans should not be shielded from the probability that she wasn't a sainted humanitarian. Her true and full story be exposed," said former counterterrorism unit police officer, Iris Aquino.

Just as in the case of Rachel Corrie, a woman killed in Gaza 12 years ago during a Palestinian riot when a bulldozer accidentally ran her over, which her supporters claim was not accident, the Islamists and the U.S. media have all but canonized Corrie. The denizens of U.S. newsrooms have been portraying her as a selfless volunteer helping poor Arab refugees.

U.S. news media and Kayla's supporters, including the Obama administration, may portray her as a modern day Florence Nightingale, there is a preponderance of evidence that while she might have offered first aid to injured Arabs in "refugee" camps, her real focus was to support the Palestinian terrorists in achieving their goals and to hamper members of the IDF on behalf of terrorist groups.

Ray Rice and Adrian Peterson
Outside the Box: Give me Solutions!

OP-ED

Gary Yannone

Gary is an author, teacher and veteran.

Lines from a John Lennon song echoed in my head as I watched and heard all the talking heads addressing Domestic violence.

"People asking questions lost in confusion,

Well I tell them there’s no problem,

Only solutions," John Lennon, ‘Watching the Wheels.’

Much of the banter is concerned with the NFL Ray Rice and Adrian Peterson stories.

It appears everyone has an opinion (including myself) on the issues. And all of this news coming on the heels of the violence and death in Ferguson, Missouri. Passionate statements and opinions abound. This debate and dialogue has spanned all the way from the White House to our college campuses. And at times people have been held accountable for so-called insensitive remarks and lost their jobs.

But, are there any solutions that would practically work and be accepted across the spectrum of ideology? I think so. Most people would agree that by seeing the Ray Rice video and the pictures from the Adrian Peterson case, the adage of a picture is worth a thousand words as very accurate. I think most people would also agree that if the policeman in Missouri who shot and killed the civilian would have had a video camera on his person recording the incident, it would have been helpful too. Technology leading the way for a more just world so to speak.

I think the first step is to make a list of all the people that must be required to wear a video camera 24/7. It would seem to defeat the purpose just to be wearing it at work or for a situation thought to be potential trouble. So, here is an attempt at a list and hopefully better the world.

1. All law enforcement entities should be on the list. Policeman, sheriffs, FBI, Homeland Security, Secret Service, etc. That includes all sexes, races, and colors.

2. Of course one of the reasons for including all law enforcement personnel is the availability and use of firearms. So, the list should include any gun owners. That way if it is the gun or if it is the person with the gun that is the problem, both sides are covered. An extension of that is anyone with a criminal record must have a video camera attached to them 24/7. This is no place to judge the severity of crimes, so that means any criminal record. Traffic tickets included.

3. Next up for inclusion would be all veterans. Not just because these are our warriors trained to kill, but as is public knowledge now many of them suffer from PTSD. Some diagnosed, some not. So blanket coverage is best suited.

4. Another group that should be required for 24/7 surveillance is all students. To play it safe, the requirement should be at least down to the preschool level.

5. All people that have been divorced must be included. The reasons are obvious.

6. Anyone with a driver’s license. Thus keeping tabs on all those possible incidents of people using their vehicle as a weapon.

7. All religious people. I was going to include just Muslims, but that might be discrimatory.

8. All people that have received any mental health counseling. It is not the purpose here to question any diagnosis, but to add potential problem groups to the list.

Well, let me pause here. This is just the beginning of the list. But, here is a near perfect way to make sure justice is done objectively. And it also has some side benefits as far as monitoring behavior. I am sure you have heard rumors concerning some of the Secret Service Agents. Let’s rid ourselves of the he said she said type of evidence. Let’s view it all on film.

Of course some uniformed people may disagree with this idea and say that this smacks of the epitome of State control. But, that sudden judgment is blind as far as the truth. In reality, this solution brings blatant objective evidence to the scale of justice. You notice, I had not included all NFL Players. But, why just the NFL? All professional and amateur sports participants should be required to wear a monitoring device 24/7. Just think how this could have helped at the OJ trial! Or the Ray Lewis murder trial. Other critics may balk at the cost. And quite frankly, I had thought we were somewhat economically bankrupt as a nation. But we must not be, here we go again starting a new war overseas, and contracting for new spaceships! So everyone get on board, the technology train is leaving the station. There are no problems, just solutions!